banner



Home  ›  What Are Animals That Have No Backbone Called

What Are Animals That Have No Backbone Called

Written By Saturday, June 11, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Animals without a vertebrate column

Invertebrates

Temporal range: Cryogenian to Present,

665–0 Ma

Pha.

Proterozoic

Archean

Had'n

Diversity of various invertebrates from different phyla
Examples of invertebrates from unlike phyla; clockwise from top-left: Chrysaora fuscescens (a cnidarian), Drosophila melanogaster (an arthropod), Caribbean reef squid (a mollusk), and Hirudo medicinalis (an annelid).
Scientific classification Edit this classification
(unranked): Filozoa
Kingdom: Animalia
Groups included
  • All animal groups not in subphylum Vertebrata

Invertebrates are species of animal that neither possess nor develop a vertebral column (commonly known every bit a backbone or spine), derived from the notochord. This is a grouping including all animals apart from the chordate subphylum Vertebrata. Familiar examples of invertebrates include arthropods, mollusks, annelids, echinoderms and cnidarians.

The majority of animal species are invertebrates; one estimate puts the figure at 97%.[one] Many invertebrate taxa have a greater number and variety of species than the entire subphylum of Vertebrata.[2] Invertebrates vary widely in size, from 50 μm (0.002 in) rotifers[iii] to the nine–10 k (thirty–33 ft) colossal squid.[iv]

Some and then-called invertebrates, such equally the Tunicata and Cephalochordata, are more closely related to vertebrates than to other invertebrates. This makes the invertebrates paraphyletic, so the term has little pregnant in taxonomy.

Etymology

The word "invertebrate" comes from the Latin word vertebra, which ways a articulation in general, and sometimes specifically a articulation from the spinal cavalcade of a vertebrate. The jointed aspect of vertebra is derived from the concept of turning, expressed in the root verto or vorto, to plow.[5] The prefix in- means "not" or "without".[half dozen]

Taxonomic significance

The term invertebrates is not always precise amidst not-biologists since it does not accurately describe a taxon in the same manner that Arthropoda, Vertebrata or Manidae exercise. Each of these terms describes a valid taxon, phylum, subphylum or family unit. "Invertebrata" is a term of convenience, not a taxon; it has very niggling circumscriptional significance except inside the Chordata. The Vertebrata equally a subphylum comprises such a pocket-sized proportion of the Metazoa that to speak of the kingdom Animalia in terms of "Vertebrata" and "Invertebrata" has limited practicality. In the more formal taxonomy of Animalia other attributes that logically should precede the presence or absence of the vertebral column in constructing a cladogram, for example, the presence of a notochord. That would at least circumscribe the Chordata. Nevertheless, even the notochord would be a less key criterion than aspects of embryological development and symmetry[7] or perchance bauplan.[8]

Despite this, the concept of invertebrates as a taxon of animals has persisted for over a century among the laity,[ix] and within the zoological customs and in its literature information technology remains in use equally a term of convenience for animals that are not members of the Vertebrata.[10] The post-obit text reflects earlier scientific agreement of the term and of those animals which have constituted it. Co-ordinate to this understanding, invertebrates practise not possess a skeleton of bone, either internal or external. They include hugely varied body plans. Many have fluid-filled, hydrostatic skeletons, like jellyfish or worms. Others have hard exoskeletons, outer shells like those of insects and crustaceans. The most familiar invertebrates include the Protozoa, Porifera, Coelenterata, Platyhelminthes, Nematoda, Annelida, Echinodermata, Mollusca and Arthropoda. Arthropoda include insects, crustaceans and arachnids.

Number of extant species

Past far the largest number of described invertebrate species are insects. The following table lists the number of described extant species for major invertebrate groups as estimated in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2014.3.[xi]

Invertebrate group Phylum Image Estimated number of
described species[11]
Insects Arthropoda European wasp white bg02.jpg i,000,000
Arachnids Arthropoda Giant-house-spider.jpg 102,248
Snails Mollusca Grapevinesnail 01.jpg 85,000
Crustaceans Arthropoda J J Wild Pseudocarcinus cropped.jpg 47,000
Clams Mollusca Argopecten irradians.jpg 20,000
Corals Cnidaria Coral Outcrop Flynn Reef.jpg 2,175
Octopi/Squid Mollusca Sepia officinalis1.jpg 900
Velvet worms Onychophora Velvet worm.jpg 165
Nautilus Mollusca Nautilus profile (white background).jpg six
Horseshoe crabs Arthropoda Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda (mangrove horseshoe crab).jpg four
Others
jellyfish, echinoderms,
sponges, other worms etc. 		— — 68,658
Full: ~1,300,000

The IUCN estimates that 66,178 extant vertebrate species have been described,[11] which means that over 95% of the described animal species in the world are invertebrates.

Characteristics

The trait that is mutual to all invertebrates is the absence of a vertebral cavalcade (courage): this creates a distinction between invertebrates and vertebrates. The distinction is one of convenience merely; it is non based on any clear biologically homologous trait, any more than the common trait of having wings functionally unites insects, bats, and birds, or than not having wings unites tortoises, snails and sponges. Existence animals, invertebrates are heterotrophs, and require sustenance in the form of the consumption of other organisms. With a few exceptions, such as the Porifera, invertebrates generally accept bodies composed of differentiated tissues. There is also typically a digestive sleeping accommodation with one or two openings to the exterior.

Morphology and symmetry

The trunk plans of virtually multicellular organisms exhibit some form of symmetry, whether radial, bilateral, or spherical. A minority, notwithstanding, exhibit no symmetry. Ane example of asymmetric invertebrates includes all gastropod species. This is easily seen in snails and ocean snails, which have helical shells. Slugs appear externally symmetrical, but their pneumostome (breathing hole) is located on the right side. Other gastropods develop external asymmetry, such equally Glaucus atlanticus that develops asymmetrical cerata as they mature. The origin of gastropod asymmetry is a subject of scientific debate.[12]

Other examples of asymmetry are found in fiddler crabs and hermit crabs. They often take 1 claw much larger than the other. If a male person fiddler loses its large hook, information technology will abound another on the opposite side after moulting. Sessile animals such equally sponges are asymmetrical[xiii] alongside coral colonies (with the exception of the individual polyps that exhibit radial symmetry); alpheidae claws that lack pincers; and some copepods, polyopisthocotyleans, and monogeneans which parasitize by attachment or residency inside the gill chamber of their fish hosts).

Nervous organisation

Neurons differ in invertebrates from mammalian cells. Invertebrates cells fire in response to similar stimuli as mammals, such as tissue trauma, high temperature, or changes in pH. The first invertebrate in which a neuron jail cell was identified was the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis. [fourteen] [15]

Learning and memory using nociceptors in the sea hare, Aplysia has been described.[16] [17] [xviii] Mollusk neurons are able to detect increasing pressures and tissue trauma.[19]

Neurons have been identified in a wide range of invertebrate species, including annelids, molluscs, nematodes and arthropods.[twenty] [21]

Respiratory organisation

Tracheal system of dissected cockroach. The largest tracheae run across the width of the torso of the cockroach and are horizontal in this image. Calibration bar, 2 mm.

The tracheal organization branches into progressively smaller tubes, here supplying the crop of the cockroach. Scale bar, 2.0 mm.

1 type of invertebrate respiratory arrangement is the open respiratory system composed of spiracles, tracheae, and tracheoles that terrestrial arthropods have to transport metabolic gases to and from tissues.[22] The distribution of spiracles can vary greatly amidst the many orders of insects, but in full general each segment of the body tin can have simply ane pair of spiracles, each of which connects to an atrium and has a relatively large tracheal tube behind it. The tracheae are invaginations of the cuticular exoskeleton that co-operative (anastomose) throughout the torso with diameters from simply a few micrometres upwardly to 0.eight mm. The smallest tubes, tracheoles, penetrate cells and serve as sites of diffusion for water, oxygen, and carbon dioxide. Gas may be conducted through the respiratory system by means of agile ventilation or passive diffusion. Unlike vertebrates, insects exercise not by and large acquit oxygen in their haemolymph.[23]

A tracheal tube may contain ridge-like circumferential rings of taenidia in various geometries such every bit loops or helices. In the head, thorax, or belly, tracheae may also be connected to air sacs. Many insects, such every bit grasshoppers and bees, which actively pump the air sacs in their abdomen, are able to control the flow of air through their trunk. In some aquatic insects, the tracheae substitution gas through the body wall directly, in the form of a gill, or role substantially equally normal, via a plastron. Notation that despite being internal, the tracheae of arthropods are shed during moulting (ecdysis).[24]

Reproduction

Like vertebrates, almost invertebrates reproduce at to the lowest degree partly through sexual reproduction. They produce specialized reproductive cells that undergo meiosis to produce smaller, motile spermatozoa or larger, non-motile ova.[25] These fuse to class zygotes, which develop into new individuals.[26] Others are capable of asexual reproduction, or sometimes, both methods of reproduction.

Social behavior is widespread in invertebrates, including cockroaches, termites, aphids, thrips, ants, bees, Passalidae, Acari, spiders, and more.[27] Social interaction is especially salient in eusocial species only applies to other invertebrates likewise.

Insects recognize information transmitted past other insects.[28] [29] [thirty]

Phyla

The term invertebrates covers several phyla. One of these are the sponges (Porifera). They were long thought to have diverged from other animals early.[31] They lack the complex organization found in most other phyla.[32] Their cells are differentiated, but in almost cases not organized into singled-out tissues.[33] Sponges typically feed by drawing in h2o through pores.[34] Some speculate that sponges are non so archaic, only may instead be secondarily simplified.[35] The Ctenophora and the Cnidaria, which includes sea anemones, corals, and jellyfish, are radially symmetric and have digestive chambers with a single opening, which serves equally both the mouth and the anus.[36] Both have distinct tissues, but they are not organized into organs.[37] There are only two main germ layers, the ectoderm and endoderm, with only scattered cells betwixt them. Equally such, they are sometimes chosen diploblastic.[38]

The Echinodermata are radially symmetric and exclusively marine, including starfish (Asteroidea), bounding main urchins, (Echinoidea), breakable stars (Ophiuroidea), sea cucumbers (Holothuroidea) and feather stars (Crinoidea).[39]

The largest fauna phylum is also included inside invertebrates: the Arthropoda, including insects, spiders, venereal, and their kin. All these organisms have a body divided into repeating segments, typically with paired appendages. In addition, they possess a hardened exoskeleton that is periodically shed during growth.[40] Two smaller phyla, the Onychophora and Tardigrada, are close relatives of the arthropods and share these traits. The Nematoda or roundworms, are perchance the second largest brute phylum, and are also invertebrates. Roundworms are typically microscopic, and occur in nearly every environment where there is water.[41] A number are of import parasites.[42] Smaller phyla related to them are the Kinorhyncha, Priapulida, and Loricifera. These groups accept a reduced coelom, chosen a pseudocoelom. Other invertebrates include the Nemertea or ribbon worms, and the Sipuncula.

Another phylum is Platyhelminthes, the flatworms.[43] These were originally considered primitive, merely it now appears they developed from more complex ancestors.[44] Flatworms are acoelomates, lacking a body cavity, as are their closest relatives, the microscopic Gastrotricha.[45] The Rotifera or rotifers, are common in aqueous environments. Invertebrates besides include the Acanthocephala or spiny-headed worms, the Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and the Cycliophora.[46]

Too included are two of the most successful fauna phyla, the Mollusca and Annelida.[47] [48] The former, which is the second-largest brute phylum past number of described species, includes animals such equally snails, clams, and squids, and the latter comprises the segmented worms, such every bit earthworms and leeches. These 2 groups accept long been considered close relatives considering of the common presence of trochophore larvae, but the annelids were considered closer to the arthropods considering they are both segmented.[49] Now, this is more often than not considered convergent evolution, attributable to many morphological and genetic differences between the ii phyla.[fifty]

Among lesser phyla of invertebrates are the Hemichordata, or acorn worms,[51] and the Chaetognatha, or arrow worms. Other phyla include Acoelomorpha, Brachiopoda, Bryozoa, Entoprocta, Phoronida, and Xenoturbellida.

Nomenclature of invertebrates

Invertebrates can be classified into several primary categories, some of which are taxonomically obsolescent or debatable, but still used equally terms of convenience. Each nevertheless appears in its own article at the following links.[52]

  • Sponges (Porifera)
  • Comb jellies (Ctenophora)
  • Medusozoans and corals (Cnidaria)
  • Acoels (Xenacoelomorpha)
  • Flatworms (Platyhelminthes)
  • Bristleworms, earthworms and leeches (Annelida)
  • Insects, springtails, crustaceans, myriapods, chelicerates (Arthropoda)
  • Chitons, snails, slugs, bivalves, tusk shells, cephalopods (Mollusca)
  • Roundworms or threadworms (Nematoda)
  • Rotifers (Rotifera)
  • Tardigrades (Tardigrada)
  • Scalidophores (Scalidophora)
  • Lophophorates (Lophophorata)
  • Velvet worms (Onychophora)
  • Arrow worms (Chaetognatha)
  • Gordian worms or horsehair worms (Nematomorpha)
  • Ribbon worms (Nemertea)
  • Placozoa
  • Loricifera
  • Starfishes, sea urchins, sea cucumbers, bounding main lilies and brittle stars (Echinodermata)
  • Acorn worms, cephalodiscids and graptolites (Hemichordata)
  • Lancelets (Amphioxiformes)
  • Salps, pyrosomes, doliolids, larvaceans and sea squirts (Tunicata)

History

The earliest beast fossils announced to be those of invertebrates. 665-million-year-old fossils in the Trezona Formation at Trezona Diameter, West Central Flinders, Due south Australia have been interpreted as being early on sponges.[53] Some paleontologists suggest that animals appeared much earlier, perhaps as early as ane billion years ago[54] though they probably became multicellular in the Tonian. Trace fossils such as tracks and burrows found in the late Neoproterozoic era indicate the presence of triploblastic worms, roughly every bit large (about 5 mm wide) and complex equally earthworms.[55]

Around 453 MYA, animals began diversifying, and many of the important groups of invertebrates diverged from one another. Fossils of invertebrates are institute in various types of sediment from the Phanerozoic.[56] Fossils of invertebrates are normally used in stratigraphy.[57]

Nomenclature

Carl Linnaeus divided these animals into only two groups, the Insecta and the now-obsolete Vermes (worms). Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, who was appointed to the position of "Curator of Insecta and Vermes" at the Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle in 1793, both coined the term "invertebrate" to describe such animals and divided the original two groups into x, by splitting Arachnida and Crustacea from the Linnean Insecta, and Mollusca, Annelida, Cirripedia, Radiata, Coelenterata and Infusoria from the Linnean Vermes. They are now classified into over xxx phyla, from simple organisms such as sea sponges and flatworms to circuitous animals such every bit arthropods and molluscs.

Significance of the group

Invertebrates are animals without a vertebral cavalcade. This has led to the conclusion that invertebrates are a group that deviates from the normal, vertebrates. This has been said to be because researchers in the by, such as Lamarck, viewed vertebrates as a "standard": in Lamarck's theory of evolution, he believed that characteristics acquired through the evolutionary process involved not only survival, but besides progression toward a "higher form", to which humans and vertebrates were closer than invertebrates were. Although goal-directed evolution has been abandoned, the stardom of invertebrates and vertebrates persists to this 24-hour interval, even though the grouping has been noted to be "hardly natural or even very sharp." Another reason cited for this continued distinction is that Lamarck created a precedent through his classifications which is now difficult to escape from. It is also possible that some humans believe that, they themselves beingness vertebrates, the grouping deserves more attention than invertebrates.[58] In any consequence, in the 1968 edition of Invertebrate Zoology, it is noted that "partitioning of the Animal Kingdom into vertebrates and invertebrates is artificial and reflects human bias in favor of man'south ain relatives." The volume likewise points out that the group lumps a vast number of species together, and so that no ane characteristic describes all invertebrates. In addition, some species included are only remotely related to 1 another, with some more than related to vertebrates than other invertebrates (run across Paraphyly).[59]

In research

For many centuries, invertebrates were neglected by biologists, in favor of large vertebrates and "useful" or charismatic species.[sixty] Invertebrate biology was not a major field of study until the piece of work of Linnaeus and Lamarck in the 18th century.[lx] During the 20th century, invertebrate zoology became 1 of the major fields of natural sciences, with prominent discoveries in the fields of medicine, genetics, palaeontology, and ecology.[60] The study of invertebrates has also benefited law enforcement, as arthropods, and especially insects, were discovered to be a source of data for forensic investigators.[40]

Two of the most commonly studied model organisms nowadays are invertebrates: the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. They accept long been the nearly intensively studied model organisms, and were among the commencement life-forms to exist genetically sequenced. This was facilitated by the severely reduced land of their genomes, simply many genes, introns, and linkages have been lost. Analysis of the starlet body of water anemone genome has emphasised the importance of sponges, placozoans, and choanoflagellates, also being sequenced, in explaining the inflow of 1500 ancestral genes unique to animals.[61] Invertebrates are also used by scientists in the field of aquatic biomonitoring to evaluate the furnishings of water pollution and climate change.[62]

See also

  • Invertebrate zoology
  • Invertebrate paleontology
  • Marine invertebrates
  • Hurting in invertebrates

References

  1. ^ May, Robert M. (xvi September 1988). "How Many Species Are At that place on Earth?". Science. 241 (4872): 1441–1449. Bibcode:1988Sci...241.1441M. doi:10.1126/science.241.4872.1441. JSTOR 1702670. PMID 17790039. S2CID 34992724. Archived from the original on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
  2. ^ Richards, O. W.; Davies, R.One thousand. (1977). Imms' General Textbook of Entomology: Book ane: Structure, Physiology and Development Volume two: Nomenclature and Biological science. Berlin: Springer. ISBN978-0-412-61390-half dozen.
  3. ^ Howey, Richard L. (1999). "Welcome to the Wonderfully Weird World of Rotifers". Micscape Magazine. Retrieved 19 Feb 2010.
  4. ^ Roper, C.F.E. & P. Jereb (2010). Family Cranchiidae. In: P. Jereb & C.F.Due east. Roper (eds.) Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species known to date. Volume 2. Myopsid and Oegopsid Squids. FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 4, Vol. 2. FAO, Rome. pp. 148–178.
  5. ^ Tucker, T. G. (1931). A Concise Etymological Dictionary of Latin. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer Verlag.
  6. ^ Skeat, Walter William (1882). An etymological lexicon of the English language language. Clarendon Press. p. 301.
  7. ^ Pechenik, January (1996). Biology of the Invertebrates. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown Publishers. ISBN978-0-697-13712-8.
  8. ^ Brusca, Richard C.; Brusca, Gary J. (1990). Invertebrates . Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. ISBN978-0-87893-098-2.
  9. ^ Dark-brown, Lesley (1993). The New shorter Oxford English lexicon on historical principles. Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon. ISBN978-0-19-861271-1.
  10. ^ Louis Agassiz (21 March 2013). Essay on Classification. Courier Corporation. pp. 115–. ISBN978-0-486-15135-nine.
  11. ^ a b c The World Conservation Union. 2014. IUCN Ruddy List of Threatened Species, 2014.3. Summary Statistics for Globally Threatened Species. Table 1: Numbers of threatened species by major groups of organisms (1996–2014).
  12. ^ Louise R. Page (2006). "Modern insights on gastropod evolution: Reevaluation of the evolution of a novel trunk plan". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 46 (2): 134–143. doi:10.1093/icb/icj018. PMID 21672730.
  13. ^ Symmetry, biological, cited at FactMonster.com from The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (2007).
  14. ^ Nicholls, J.G. and Baylor, D.A., (1968). Specific modalities and receptive fields of sensory neurons in CNS of the leech. Journal of Neurophysiology, 31: 740–756
  15. ^ Pastor, J., Soria, B. and Belmonte, C., (1996). Backdrop of the nociceptive neurons of the leech segmental ganglion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75: 2268–2279
  16. ^ Byrne, J.H., Castellucci, V.F. and Kandel, Eastward.R., (1978). Contribution of individual mechanoreceptor sensory neurons to defensive gill-withdrawal reflex in Aplysia. Periodical of Neurophysiology, 41: 418–431
  17. ^ Castellucci, Five., Pinsker, H., Kupfermann, I. and Kandel, E.R., (1970). Neuronal mechanisms of habituation and dishabituation of the gill-withdrawal reflex in Aplysia. Science, 167: 1745–1748
  18. ^ Fischer, T.Thou., Jacobson, D.A., Counsell, A.N., et al., (2011). Regulation of low-threshold afferent activity may contribute to short-term habituation in Aplysia californica. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 95: 248-259
  19. ^ Illich, P.A and Walters, E.T., (1997). Mechanosensory neurons innervating Aplysia siphon encode noxious stimuli and brandish nociceptive sensitization. The Periodical of Neuroscience, 17: 459-469
  20. ^ Eisemann, C.H., Jorgensen, W.1000., Merritt, D.J., Rice, G.J., Cribb, B.Westward., Webb, P.D. and Zalucki, M.P., (1984). "Do insects feel hurting? — A biological view". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 40: 1420–1423
  21. ^ St John Smith, E. and Lewin, G.R., (2009). Nociceptors: a phylogenetic view. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 195: 1089-1106
  22. ^ Wasserthal, Lutz T. (1998). Chapter 25: The Open up Hemolymph Organisation of Holometabola and Its Relation to the Tracheal Space. In "Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates". Wiley-Liss, Inc. ISBN 0-471-15955-7.
  23. ^ Westneat, Marking W.; Betz, Oliver; Blob, Richard W.; Fezzaa, Kamel; Cooper, James West.; Lee, Wah-Keat (January 2003). "Tracheal Respiration in Insects Visualized with Synchrotron X-ray Imaging". Science. 299 (5606): 558–560. Bibcode:2003Sci...299..558W. doi:10.1126/science.1078008. PMID 12543973. S2CID 43634044. [ permanent dead link ]
  24. ^ Ewer, John (11 October 2005). "How the Ecdysozoan Changed Its Coat". PLOS Biology. 3 (10): e349. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030349. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC1250302. PMID 16207077.
  25. ^ Schwartz, Jill (2010). Master the GED 2011 (w/CD). Peterson's. p. 371. ISBN978-0-7689-2885-iii.
  26. ^ Hamilton, Matthew B. (2009). Population genetics . Wiley-Blackwell. p. 55. ISBN978-one-4051-3277-0.
  27. ^ The Evolution of Social Beliefs in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Printing. 1997. ISBN978-0521589772.
  28. ^
  29. ^ Seeley T.D.; Visscher P.K.; Passino K.Yard. (2006). "Group determination making in honey bee swarms". American Scientist. 94 (iii): 220–229. doi:ten.1511/2006.3.220.
  30. ^ Frisch, Karl von. (1967) The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Printing of Harvard University Press.
  31. ^ Bhamrah, H. Southward.; Kavita Juneja (2003). An Introduction to Porifera. Anmol Publications PVT. LTD. p. 58. ISBN978-81-261-0675-2.
  32. ^ Sumich, James L. (2008). Laboratory and Field Investigations in Marine Life. Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 67. ISBN978-0-7637-5730-4.
  33. ^ Jessop, Nancy Meyer (1970). Biosphere; a study of life. Prentice-Hall. p. 428.
  34. ^ Sharma, N. Due south. (2005). Continuity And Evolution Of Animals. Mittal Publications. p. 106. ISBN978-81-8293-018-six.
  35. ^ Dunn et al. 2008. "Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the creature tree of life". Nature 06614.
  36. ^ Langstroth, Lovell; Libby Langstroth; Todd Newberry; Monterey Bay Aquarium (2000). A living bay: the underwater earth of Monterey Bay. University of California Press. p. 244. ISBN978-0-520-22149-9.
  37. ^ Safra, Jacob E. (2003). The New Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 16. Encyclopædia Britannica. p. 523. ISBN978-0-85229-961-6.
  38. ^ Kotpal, R. L. (2012). Modern Text Volume of Zoology: Invertebrates. Rastogi Publications. p. 184. ISBN978-81-7133-903-vii.
  39. ^ Alcamo, Edward (1998). Biology Coloring Workbook. The Princeton Review. p. 220. ISBN978-0-679-77884-four.
  40. ^ a b Gunn, Alan (2009). Essential forensic biology. John Wiley and Sons. p. 214. ISBN978-0-470-75804-five.
  41. ^ Prewitt, Nancy Fifty.; Larry S. Underwood; William Surver (2003). BioInquiry: making connections in biology. John Wiley. p. 289. ISBN978-0-471-20228-8.
  42. ^ Schmid-Hempel, Paul (1998). Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press. p. 75. ISBN978-0-691-05924-ii.
  43. ^ Gilson, Étienne (2004). El espíritu de la filosofía medieval. Ediciones Rialp. p. 384. ISBN978-84-321-3492-0.
  44. ^ Ruiz-Trillo, Iñaki; Riutort, Marta; Littlewood, D. Timothy J.; Herniou, Elisabeth A.; Baguñà, Jaume (March 1999). "Acoel Flatworms: Primeval Extant Bilaterian Metazoans, Non Members of Platyhelminthes". Science. 283 (5409): 1919–1923. Bibcode:1999Sci...283.1919R. doi:10.1126/science.283.5409.1919. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 10082465. S2CID 6079655. [ permanent dead link ]
  45. ^ Todaro, Antonio. "Gastrotricha: Overview". Gastrotricha: Earth Portal. University of Modena & Reggio Emilia. Retrieved 26 January 2008.
  46. ^ Kristensen, Reinhardt Møbjerg (July 2002). "An Introduction to Loricifera, Cycliophora, and Micrognathozoa". Integrative and Comparative Biological science. 42 (3): 641–651. doi:10.1093/icb/42.3.641. PMID 21708760.
  47. ^ "Biodiversity: Mollusca". The Scottish Clan for Marine Scientific discipline. Archived from the original on 8 July 2006. Retrieved 19 November 2007.
  48. ^ Russell, Bruce J. (Writer), Denning, David (Writer) (2000). Branches on the Tree of Life: Annelids (VHS). BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES.
  49. ^ Eernisse, Douglas J.; Albert, James S.; Anderson, Frank East. (1 September 1992). "Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: A phylogenetic analysis of spiralean metazoan morphology". Systematic Biology. 41 (3): 305–330. doi:10.2307/2992569. ISSN 1063-5157. JSTOR 2992569.
  50. ^ Eernisse, Douglas J.; Kim, Chang Bae; Moon, Seung Yeo; Gelder, Stuart R.; Kim, Won (September 1996). "Phylogenetic Relationships of Annelids, Molluscs, and Arthropods Evidenced from Molecules and Morphology". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 43 (3): 207–215. Bibcode:1996JMolE..43..207K. doi:10.1007/PL00006079. PMID 8703086. [ dead link ]
  51. ^ Tobin, Allan J.; Jennie Dusheck (2005). Asking about life. Cengage Learning. p. 497. ISBN978-0-534-40653-0.
  52. ^ "What Are the Main Groups of Invertebrates?".
  53. ^ Maloof, Adam C.; Rose, Catherine Five.; Beach, Robert; Samuels, Bradley M.; Calmet, Claire C.; Erwin, Douglas H.; Poirier, Gerald R.; Yao, Nan; Simons, Frederik J. (17 August 2010). "Possible animal-body fossils in pre-Marinoan limestones from South Commonwealth of australia". Nature Geoscience. three (9): 653. Bibcode:2010NatGe...3..653M. doi:x.1038/ngeo934.
  54. ^ Campbell. Neil A.; Jane B. Reece (2005). Biology (7 ed.). Pearson, Benjamin Cummings. p. 526. ISBN978-0-8053-7171-0.
  55. ^ Seilacher, A.; Bose, P.K.; Pflüger, F. (October 1998). "Animals More Than 1 Billion Years Ago: Trace Fossil Testify from Republic of india". Scientific discipline. 282 (5386): fourscore–83. Bibcode:1998Sci...282...80S. doi:ten.1126/science.282.5386.80. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 9756480.
  56. ^ Clarkson, Euan Neilson Kerr (1998). Invertebrate palaeontology and development. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN978-0-632-05238-7.
  57. ^ Kummel, Bernhard (1954). Condition of invertebrate paleontology, 1953. Ayer Publishing. p. 93. ISBN978-0-405-12715-1.
  58. ^ Barnes, Richard Stephen Kent (2001). The Invertebrates: A Synthesis. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 3. ISBN978-0-632-04761-1.
  59. ^ Barnes, Robert D. (1968). Invertebrate Zoology (2nd ed.). Westward.B. Saunders. OCLC 173898.
  60. ^ a b c Ducarme, Frédéric (2015). "Why study invertebrates? A philosophical argument from Aristotle". No Bones (Smithsonian Institution website).
  61. ^ N.H. Putnam, NH; et al. (July 2007). "Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic system". Science. 317 (5834): 86–94. Bibcode:2007Sci...317...86P. doi:x.1126/science.1139158. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17615350. S2CID 9868191.
  62. ^ Lawrence, J.E.; Lunde, K.B.; Mazor, R.D.; Bêche, L.A.; McElravy, Eastward.P.; Resh, V.H. (2010). "Long-Term Macroinvertebrate Responses to Climate change: Implications for Biological Assessment in Mediterranean-Climate Streams". Periodical of the North American Benthological Order. 29 (4): 1424–1440. doi:x.1899/09-178.1. S2CID 84679634.

Further reading

  • Hyman, L. H. 1940. The Invertebrates (6 volumes) New York : McGraw-Colina. A classic piece of work.
  • Anderson, D. T. (Ed.). (2001). Invertebrate zoology (2d ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brusca, R. C., & Brusca, G. J. (2003). Invertebrates (2nd ed.). Sunderland, Mass. : Sinauer Assembly.
  • Miller, South.A., & Harley, J.P. (1996). Zoology (fourth ed.). Boston: WCB/McGraw-Loma.
  • Pechenik, Jan A. (2005). Biology of the invertebrates. Boston: McGraw-Hill, Higher Instruction. pp. 590 pp. ISBN978-0-07-234899-6.
  • Ruppert, Due east. Due east., Play tricks, R. S., & Barnes, R. D. (2004). Invertebrate zoology: a functional evolutionary arroyo. Belmont, CA: Thomas-Brooks/Cole.
  • Adiyodi, Thou.G. & Adyiodi, R.1000. (Eds) 1983- . Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates. Wiley, New York. (Many volumes.)
  • Giese, A.M. & Pearse, J.Due south. (Eds) 1974- . Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates. Academic Printing, New York. (Many volumes.)
  • Advances in Invertebrate Reproduction. Elsevier Scientific discipline, Amsterdam. (Five volumes.)

External links

  • A. R. Maggenti; Due south. Gardner (2005). Online Dictionary of Invertebrate Zoology.
  • Buglife (UK)
  • African Invertebrates

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invertebrate

Posted by: yearbywartime.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Are Animals That Have No Backbone Called"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel