NVIDIA makes its argument for why the Arm acquisition should go through

NVIDIA'southward seen no shortage of barriers when it comes to getting its Arm acquisition passed and completed. A bevy of regulatory bodies accept either held up the process or direct stood in the way of information technology, as we're seeing with the FTC's lawsuit and Mainland china's lengthy review process. Only now we have a closer look into another element of the merger's headaches: The ongoing United kingdom probe.

The UK government has a website wherein yous can peruse its Contest and Markets Authority (CMA) cases. One of the entries listed there is the NVIDIA-Arm merger. On the folio associated with the case, at that place's a slice of documentation labeled "Main parties initial Phase 2 submission," which will take yous to a PDF containing NVIDIA's counters to the Britain regulatory concerns leveled against information technology. Here's a key excerpt from the document:

NVIDIA seeks to grow and raise Arm's IP in PC, and to license it broadly, helping Arm to build an ecosystem in PC. NVIDIA'due south strategy would undeniably benefit Arm, the U.k., and Arm customers worldwide, not impairment competition. The Transaction will spur competition in Consoles, as NVIDIA volition take an incentive to enhance Arm's IP to compete with x86 chips from Intel and AMD.

NVIDIA's full remarks in the document explain how these benefits would come to laissez passer, but this particular paragraph sums information technology up. The merger volition help everyone, including the UK, and competitors will be fine, co-ordinate to the RTX GPU maker. Information technology also made certain to namedrop its Cambridge-one supercomputer, which it "built at its own expense and launched in the UK for medical research." If you're interested in this whole merger saga, the total document is worth a read.

Review: Surface Laptop SE is the new standard for K-8 Windows PCs

Keeping it affordable

Review: Surface Laptop SE is the new standard for K-viii Windows PCs

Starting at just $250, Microsoft's offset foray into affordable laptops for the education market is a winner. With a gorgeous blueprint, excellent thermals, and a fantastic typing experience, Microsoft would practise right to sell this straight to consumers too. Let'due south simply hope Intel tin can make a better CPU.

Exclusivity over saturation

Why Xbox Game Pass rightfully rejects the Spotify model

Spotify is often cited as a doomsday example of what Xbox Game Pass could do to the video game industry. The reality is quite the reverse, Microsoft is rejecting the Spotify model, and rightfully so.